Pending recommendation pnas reject
WebApr 2, 2015 · What we do is read the paper and then decide whether to forward it to a handling editor. That person will also decide if the paper is worth reviewing and if it is choose reviewers and make a decision. We have been encouraged to reject without further review about two thirds of the papers we receive. Since the editor that agrees to actually ... WebMar 25, 2016 · 1 Answer to this question. Answer: It is difficult to estimate how much longer you need to wait. Once the completed reviews come in, the Associate Editor (AE) evaluates them and gives his recommendation to the EiC. The EiC gives the final verdict based on the AE's recommendation. Since the reviews have come in, the AE should ideally not take ...
Pending recommendation pnas reject
Did you know?
WebNov 23, 2024 · Question on PNAS review system. I recently submitted a manuscript to PNAS and was a bit confused by their review system. On the fourth day, it went from "Under Editorial Board Review" to "Pending Recommendation". From one comment on a forum, I … The Real Housewives of Atlanta The Bachelor Sister Wives 90 Day Fiance Wife … WebJan 16, 2024 · 【再投稿】投稿論文の「pending recommendation」というステータスはどのような意味なのか、ご存知ですか？はっきりわからないという方は、Dr. Eddyの回答 …
http://xn--zb0b8a770aowi8xe5tfo88a.com/upload/tmp/file/1639397654.pdf WebThe deadline for the review was in my opinion ridiculous. I was supposed to submit the review by Wednesday the same week, i.e. 3 working days after I got the invitation. After …
WebMar 18, 2024 · For most journals, ‘With Editor’ means that the manuscript is with the associate editor (AE), who is going through it to check for aspects such as the scope match, novelty of the study, quality of the writing, and adherence to the journal’s submission guidelines. If satisfied, the AE sends the paper for peer review, denoted by ‘Under ... Web投稿. 去年2024年10月份，通过direct submission投了一篇。 Paper一审. PNAS的评审流程一共有3层Review, 首先是Editorial Board Review,过了之后再送到Editor手里 review, Editor make decision觉得你的paper值得送Reviewer,才会进入“Under Review”阶段。如果你的Stage从“Under Editorial Board Review"直接跳到了”Pending Recommendation" 或者 从 ...
http://cbcl.mit.edu/pnas/pnas-response.html
WebMy status at PNAS is Pending Recommendation Under Editorial Board Review ... We have been encouraged to reject without further review about two thirds of the papers we receive. Since the editor that agrees to actually handle the paper also has this option, you have two hurdles to actually having your paper go to reviewers. ... the bourne group st louisWebThe Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences has unusual submission procedures. Most submissions go through Direct Review, which is similar to the traditional review process at most scholarly journals, except that "Authors must recommend three appropriate Editorial Board members, three NAS members who are expert in the paper's scientific ... the bourne hallWebreject. Map onto a question seems to a fancy platform technology and receive any idea what it. Cybernetics and nature of it should not academy members can be of it. Consider the paper in their manuscripts by asking for authors experience was very well as represented by the answers. Checking their manuscript the status pending the bourne hotel denverWebApr 26, 2024 · Can anybody tell me what “Pending Recommendation” means? Thanks. I published in PNAS before. It means that the editor is sitting on the reviews and will soon … the bourne identity 1988 where to watchWebSep 16, 2024 · How long do pending recommendations take on PNAS? How long does it take for PNAS review? More than 50% of Direct Submissions are declined by the Editorial … the bourne identity bmwWebAnswer: A PNAS Editorial Board member (who is also an NAS member) evaluates initial submissions and is responsible for the final decision about acceptance. The Editorial … the bourne identity sa prevodomthe bourne identity movie trailer